I've spent more of my life in Oklahoma than anywhere else. I like the weather here, given my passion for severe thunderstorms. I like the physical geography of the state, with its large contrasts from east to west. I was rather satisfied with the education I received here at the University of Oklahoma (OU) and had some great mentors who were OU faculty and staff. However, recent postings on social media have raised a point of concern with regard to the University's "mascot" - the Sooners. The school's fight song is "Boomer Sooner", composed by Fred Waring (!).
Many people are unaware of the origin of the term Sooners - it's tied to the Oklahoma Land Rush of 1889. The "Boomers" were settlers who tried to grab parcels of land blatantly in the so-called "unassigned lands" (that was home to Native Americans) before the official starting date of 22 April 1989. The US Army removed as many of them as they could. The "Sooners" were people who sneaked into the unassigned lands early but kept a low profile, hoping to make a legal claim after the official starting date. Both Boomers and Sooners were, effectively, cheaters seeking to grab the land of the Native Americans before they were allowed to do so. These are not exactly the sort of folks that one would choose as a role model and certainly should be somewhat embarrassing to the University. But I have my doubts many associated with OU ever give it any thought.
We already have seen a growing chorus of discontent by indigenous people with using Native American-associated terms for sporting team and Universities. Recently, the 'mascot' of the University of North Dakota was changed from "The Fighting Sioux" to "The Fighting Hawks" in response to many protests by the Sioux tribe. The controversy there was long and bitter. There also has been concern about the Kansas City Chiefs, the Florida State Seminoles, the Washington Redskins (!), the Cleveland Indians, the Chicago Blackhawks, and many others. Not surprisingly, there's been considerable pushback from those who rationalize such uses of these nicknames and logos. I'm not about to enter the morass of that debate, but I do generally believe that our use of such cultural icons for our own purposes is disrespectful to Native Americans and their cultures. Obviously, there are those who disagree.
Here at OU, the mascot is even worse than the preceding examples, because it honors those who participated in the plundering of Native American lands by white settlers. The Boomers and Sooners grabbed their parcels of land by illegal means. The Native Americans were the ultimate losers, sadly. The whole of the lower 48 states represents the home of Native Americans who were here long before any white European settlers arrived to claim all those lands (except for reservations of generally worthless land assigned to those Native Americans who were not killed). The indigenous people of the Americas were subjected to various forms of genocide and destruction of the original environment on which they depended.
Our treatment of indigenous people is shameful and it continues right up to this very day! Anyone with a conscience should be deeply ashamed of this aspect of our national history. As usual, the rationale for this history has been based on viewing them as primitive savages who were not even qualified as human beings with unalienable rights. I have little expectation that OU will be changing their mascot any time soon. White privilege is alive and thriving here in Oklahoma, and that isn't likely to change in the foreseeable future. But I don't have to like that situation, and I don't have to support robbing Native Americans of their cultural heritage.