Listening to the many tributes to Nelson Mandela today, following his death at age 95, I was reminded of how fortunate the world has been to have been blessed with such an amazing human being. After being imprisoned for 27 years, this man somehow came to the realization that he would never be free if he continued to hate his oppressors. So he had the wisdom to let his hate go, and when he re-created a new nation on the rubble of apartheid, it was not a nation soaked with the blood of violent retribution. Rather, it became a nation where his former enemies could go about their lives without the fear and oppression that Nelson Mandela lived with under apartheid. It was not to be tit-for-tat! The depth of the humanity within this man is beyond words! His example is one of the all-too-few shining moments for the human race in the 20th century.
Mandela's deep understanding of humanity and his unshakeable morality gave him the moral high ground and he wielded the power of that moral authority to the benefit of all, even long before he was even released from prison! He used but never abused the power he had - after all, moral authority is only powerful from the high ground. Stoop to the level of your enemy and your power is forfeit. And he never sought to retain power, giving up his Presidency after but one term. This is a lesson our US government has yet to learn!
There's another such towering figure in our history - Martin Luther King - another deeply human person who also happened to be black. Alas, unlike Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King was taken from us long before his time. Nevertheless, in the time he had, he revealed the shining light of freedom and love for all humans and that vision can never be forgotten. That we lost him too soon is tragic, but at least he left an enduring legacy that any reasonable human should be proud to inherit.
Sadly, despite such examples (and there are others, of course), the poisonous influence of racism and bigotry still lingers in this world and in this nation, which is supposed to be dedicated to the proposition that all people should be offered equal opportunity. We Americans have yet to achieve this noble ideal, and it may be a long time in becoming a reality, if ever. But it's through such people as Martin Luther King that we've been able to make whatever progress we've achieved to date.
Therefore, it's appropriate to consider how many such men and women, who had great gifts they could have shared with us all, have been oppressed and snuffed out before they had a chance to share their insights and humanity with us all. What bright lights were extinguished under the bushel of racism and bigotry before they were allowed to shine for all of us? What men and women around the world have never been given the chance to prosper and find their opportunity to share their insights and wisdom with the world? Racism, religious bigotry, misogyny are all excuses to oppress and silence their voices, to hide their lights, to keep them from achieving their potential. How many such souls have been trodden into dust without giving this world the benefit of having known them?
Racism, bigotry, misogyny - these are lies that cannot withstand even the slightest touch of rationality. They're irrational concepts, they're baseless fallacies used by pathetic weaklings to make themselves feel superior despite their obvious recognition of their own inferiority. It's just not possible to raise yourself by taking others down. These are human weaknesses that must be repudiated and not allowed to have the power to oppress. A sense of justice demands it. And it's in our Constitution!
Think of the Anne Franks of the world, snuffed out by evil people in their pathetic but ruthless lust for power. How many nameless, faceless people have died in conflicts, been slaughtered in pogroms and tribal massacres, in pointless wars - all without ever achieving the prominence they might have deserved. How many people crammed into hopeless ghettos with limited opportunity have never been granted a chance to share with us their great gifts? What things might we now understand that we could have learned from them? What scientific knowledge would now be benefiting the world, had they been given voice? What profound works of art might we have to share, had they been allowed to achieve?
What have we lost? What could possibly have been worth the price we've paid for our racism and bigotry? Can we never get to the point where we can work together for the common good, rather than being ruled by our primitive tribalism and barbarism? Perhaps we can achieve this ideal only with the help of some truly great people we've so far been willing to stomp into silence and anonymity. Let these people live and prosper!!
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
The myth of professional versus amateur chasers
It's not uncommon to hear storm chasers described as either professional or amateur chasers. There might be a very, very tiny fraction of chasers who make their entire income from storm chasing and nothing else. Such are the only chasers who might literally consider themselves professional chasers and their ranks are negligibly small compared with the number of people who chase storms. If that's the case, then essentially everyone else is an amateur! That's not a useful way to group storm chasers, so I'm proposing some new groupings.
1. As I've said many times, most all regular veteran storm chasers - those who make an annual storm chase trek and have done so more than a few times - are not seeking to become dependent on chasing for their livelihood. It's a hobby they enjoy for the thrill of the hunt and the awesome spectacle they can witness with their own eyes. Many spend a fair sum on chasing (my costs run about $1000 per week), and they may be able to offset that to a greater or lesser extent by selling photos and videos. Since these are people who have chased for several years, they may have accumulated considerable expertise in chasing techniques and learned a fair amount about storms even if they're not meteorologists. There are many different reasons for someone to be a regular chaser and those reasons usually dictate their personal chasing behavior choices. Some are willing to take on relatively high risk situations, others not so much risk. Not all veterans engage in responsible chasing, and anyone, no matter how experienced, can make serious mistakes, as we have learned this year (2013).
2. Then there are chasers who participate regularly in serious scientific field observations (perhaps in addition to their own personal chase treks) and are either students or practicing professional scientists. Let me call them scientific storm chasers. For anyone who has ever done this, it can be quite constraining compared to a private chase - you have duties and have to be in pre-assigned positions rather than just going for whatever interests you. This sort of chasing is hard work and its main reward comes when the data collected are used for scientific analysis of the storms, leading to publications in journals and presentations at scientific conferences. It's not at all about personal chasing goals. It's about contributing to the growth of scientific knowledge. That said, such chasers should accept a very high standard of responsible chase behavior: primarily regarding their driving on public roads. Unfortunately, not all of them do so all the time.
3. We have seen a growth in what I might call opportunistic chasing. These are people who chase primarily within a limited area, on occasions when storms develop nearby. I sometimes operate in this mode, when I'm not on my annual storm chase vacation - targeting storms in central Oklahoma, as I did on 20 May 2013. We have referred to this as a "gentleman's" chase - usually more or less leisurely and without all the complex preparations that a chase trek involves. Some local citizens, perhaps having seen storm videos on TV, venture out on storms near where they live, seeking to sample the chase experience without expending a lot of effort. Many such opportunistic chasers know very little about storms and sometimes behave very irresponsibly (including drunk driving!). Because such opportunistic chasers are ignorant and inexperienced, they can be a danger to themselves and others, adding to the problem of "chaser convergence" in certain situations.
4. Recently, there's been some growth in media chasers going out as sort-of 'spotters' for TV stations, providing on-scene reports of storms, including live video for the station to broadcast. Such chasers are usually restricted to a certain territory within or close to the viewing area for their sponsoring station. The quality of these media chasers varies considerably. Many of them are seriously deficient in their understanding of what they're seeing and doing, and some of them engage in very irresponsible driving behavior, and a few are prone to serious exaggeration of what they're seeing. A colleague and I wrote about them here.
5. Finally, there's the ever-changing group new chasers. They've just begun serious chasing and may or may not go on to become regular veteran chasers. Their experience level is low, their chasing tactics are still new and evolving, they may or may not yet have seen some major events. Many are defensive about their status as 'newbies' - feeling they may not get the respect they think they deserve. Respect from others as a chaser is earned over time, not something granted automatically. Some may have a lot to learn about chasing responsibly - others do so without much fanfare. A lack of experience always represents something of a danger in storm chasing. What happens in those first few years can have a large impact on how they develop as a storm chaser.
Thus, I'm proposing five broad classes of storm chasers. Some individuals can appear in more than one of these classes. There can be a wide range of knowledge within each group, as the experience level can vary considerably. Thus, the distinction is not at all between "professional" and "amateur" chasers. Such words have little relevance in the real world of storm chasing.
1. As I've said many times, most all regular veteran storm chasers - those who make an annual storm chase trek and have done so more than a few times - are not seeking to become dependent on chasing for their livelihood. It's a hobby they enjoy for the thrill of the hunt and the awesome spectacle they can witness with their own eyes. Many spend a fair sum on chasing (my costs run about $1000 per week), and they may be able to offset that to a greater or lesser extent by selling photos and videos. Since these are people who have chased for several years, they may have accumulated considerable expertise in chasing techniques and learned a fair amount about storms even if they're not meteorologists. There are many different reasons for someone to be a regular chaser and those reasons usually dictate their personal chasing behavior choices. Some are willing to take on relatively high risk situations, others not so much risk. Not all veterans engage in responsible chasing, and anyone, no matter how experienced, can make serious mistakes, as we have learned this year (2013).
2. Then there are chasers who participate regularly in serious scientific field observations (perhaps in addition to their own personal chase treks) and are either students or practicing professional scientists. Let me call them scientific storm chasers. For anyone who has ever done this, it can be quite constraining compared to a private chase - you have duties and have to be in pre-assigned positions rather than just going for whatever interests you. This sort of chasing is hard work and its main reward comes when the data collected are used for scientific analysis of the storms, leading to publications in journals and presentations at scientific conferences. It's not at all about personal chasing goals. It's about contributing to the growth of scientific knowledge. That said, such chasers should accept a very high standard of responsible chase behavior: primarily regarding their driving on public roads. Unfortunately, not all of them do so all the time.
3. We have seen a growth in what I might call opportunistic chasing. These are people who chase primarily within a limited area, on occasions when storms develop nearby. I sometimes operate in this mode, when I'm not on my annual storm chase vacation - targeting storms in central Oklahoma, as I did on 20 May 2013. We have referred to this as a "gentleman's" chase - usually more or less leisurely and without all the complex preparations that a chase trek involves. Some local citizens, perhaps having seen storm videos on TV, venture out on storms near where they live, seeking to sample the chase experience without expending a lot of effort. Many such opportunistic chasers know very little about storms and sometimes behave very irresponsibly (including drunk driving!). Because such opportunistic chasers are ignorant and inexperienced, they can be a danger to themselves and others, adding to the problem of "chaser convergence" in certain situations.
4. Recently, there's been some growth in media chasers going out as sort-of 'spotters' for TV stations, providing on-scene reports of storms, including live video for the station to broadcast. Such chasers are usually restricted to a certain territory within or close to the viewing area for their sponsoring station. The quality of these media chasers varies considerably. Many of them are seriously deficient in their understanding of what they're seeing and doing, and some of them engage in very irresponsible driving behavior, and a few are prone to serious exaggeration of what they're seeing. A colleague and I wrote about them here.
5. Finally, there's the ever-changing group new chasers. They've just begun serious chasing and may or may not go on to become regular veteran chasers. Their experience level is low, their chasing tactics are still new and evolving, they may or may not yet have seen some major events. Many are defensive about their status as 'newbies' - feeling they may not get the respect they think they deserve. Respect from others as a chaser is earned over time, not something granted automatically. Some may have a lot to learn about chasing responsibly - others do so without much fanfare. A lack of experience always represents something of a danger in storm chasing. What happens in those first few years can have a large impact on how they develop as a storm chaser.
Thus, I'm proposing five broad classes of storm chasers. Some individuals can appear in more than one of these classes. There can be a wide range of knowledge within each group, as the experience level can vary considerably. Thus, the distinction is not at all between "professional" and "amateur" chasers. Such words have little relevance in the real world of storm chasing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
